Orzhov Lifegain - Deck Analysis 28-10-2026

Summary Statistics

17
Decks Analyzed

7d
Days Analyzed

51
Unique Cards

14
Universal (≥95%)

18
Staples (≥75%)

16
Flex Options

46.5
Consistency Score

Deck Diversity Analysis

Distribution of cards by presence tier. Higher diversity means more flexible deckbuilding options.

Cards most frequently present in the mainboard across analyzed decklists.

Cards most frequently present in the sideboard across analyzed decklists.

When a card is included, how many copies are typically played? This view uses the combined card statistics like the original report.

MB/SB Comparison

Delta view of cross-role cards only: positive values on the right mean the card is more common in sideboards, while negative values on the left mean it is more common in mainboards.

Card Copy Consistency

Card copy consistency with error bars showing standard deviation across decks. Smaller bars mean more stable copy counts.

Mainboard Staples (75%+)

Core cards that define this archetype. These should almost always be in your deck.

Card Name	Presence Rate	Avg Copies	Std Dev	Total Copies	Appears in Decks
Amalia Benavides Aguirre	100.0%	4.00	0.00	68	17
Case Of The Uneaten Feast	100.0%	4.00	0.00	68	17
Godless Shrine	100.0%	4.00	0.00	68	17
Hinterland Sanctifier	100.0%	4.00	0.00	68	17
Starting Town	100.0%	4.00	0.00	68	17
Enlightened Confidant	100.0%	3.88	0.33	66	17
Haliya, Guided By Light	100.0%	3.88	0.33	66	17
Concealed Courtyard	100.0%	3.82	0.39	65	17
Lunar Convocation	100.0%	3.65	0.49	62	17
Starscape Cleric	100.0%	3.24	1.03	55	17
Erode	100.0%	3.06	0.75	52	17
Moseo, Vein's New Dean	100.0%	3.06	0.43	52	17
Liliana The Faultless	100.0%	1.82	0.53	31	17
Multiversal Passage	94.1%	3.94	0.25	63	16
Aunt May	76.5%	1.69	0.48	22	13

Core Mainboard Cards (50-74%)

Important cards that appear in most builds but aren't universal. Strong considerations for your deck.

Card Name	Presence Rate	Avg Copies	Std Dev	Total Copies	Appears in Decks
Great Arashin City	64.7%	1.64	0.50	18	11

Flex Mainboard Cards (10-49%)

Cards that reflect tuning, preference, and local metagame choices.

Card Name	Presence Rate	Avg Copies	Total Copies	Appears in Decks
Bleachbone Verge	41.2%	2.14	15	7
Bitter Triumph	23.5%	1.75	7	4
Dalkovan Encampment	23.5%	1.00	4	4
Ajani Resolute	17.6%	1.33	4	3
Bloodthirsty Conqueror	17.6%	1.00	3	3
Shattered Sanctum	11.8%	2.50	5	2
Deep-cavern Bat	11.8%	2.00	4	2
Voice Of Victory	11.8%	2.00	4	2
Elspeth, Storm Slayer	11.8%	1.00	2	2
Fountainport	11.8%	1.00	2	2
Seam Rip	11.8%	1.00	2	2

Cross-Role Cards

New analysisCards that appear in both mainboard and sideboard across different lists, indicating strategic flexibility.

Card Name	Main %	Side %	Main Avg	Side Avg	Main Decks	Side Decks
Lunar Convocation	100.0%	29.4%	3.65	0.29	17	5
Starscape Cleric	100.0%	29.4%	3.24	0.41	17	5
Bitter Triumph	23.5%	11.8%	1.75	0.50	4	2
Bloodthirsty Conqueror	17.6%	47.1%	0.38	1.00	3	8
Ajani Resolute	17.6%	11.8%	0.80	0.60	3	2
Seam Rip	11.8%	100.0%	0.12	2.06	2	17
Voice Of Victory	11.8%	35.3%	0.57	1.29	2	6
Elspeth, Storm Slayer	11.8%	17.6%	0.40	0.60	2	3

Sideboard Tech Cards

New analysisCards with strong sideboard adoption (> 20%) and little or no mainboard use.

Card Name	Main %	Side %	Main Avg	Side Avg	Main Decks	Side Decks
Duress	0.0%	94.1%	0.00	3.12	0	16
Pyrrhic Strike	0.0%	76.5%	0.00	1.92	0	13
Sheltered By Ghosts	0.0%	52.9%	0.00	3.56	0	9
Ghost Vacuum	0.0%	52.9%	0.00	1.89	0	9
Curious Farm Animals	5.9%	47.1%	0.12	2.00	1	8
Strategic Betrayal	0.0%	41.2%	0.00	2.29	0	7
M.o.d.o.k.	0.0%	23.5%	0.00	1.00	0	4
Requisition Raid	0.0%	23.5%	0.00	1.00	0	4

Silver Bullets

New analysisLow-copy (< 20%), sideboard-only answers.

Card Name	Side %	Side Avg	Side Decks
Decorum Dissertation	17.6	1.00	3
Cease/desist	11.8	1.00	2
Thought-stalker Warlock	5.9	3.00	1
Cathar Commando	5.9	2.00	1
Clarion Conqueror	5.9	1.00	1
Phyrexian Arena	5.9	1.00	1
Raise The Past	5.9	1.00	1
Raven Eagle	5.9	1.00	1
Shattered Acolyte	5.9	1.00	1
Space-time Anomaly	5.9	1.00	1
Vicious Rivalry	5.9	1.00	1

Created by Cia91 - Version 4.12
It contains unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Fan Content Policy. Not approved/endorsed by Wizards. Portions of the materials used are property of Wizards of the Coast LLC.